Global Warming Morphs into the Solar Minimum

This post was originally published on this site

InvestmentWatchBlog

Since Climate Change (CC) has been a constant of life on Gaia with the evolution of photosynthesis 3.2 billion years ago and has more complexities than this one essay can address; ergo, this article will explore CO2’s historic contribution to global warming (GW) as well as explore the relationship of Solar Minimum (SM) to Earth’s climate.

Even before the UN-initiated Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) formed in 1988, the common assumption was that carbon dioxide was the key greenhouse gas and that its increases were the driving force solely responsible for rising climate temperatures. At that time, anthropogenic (human caused) GW was declared to be the existential crisis of our time, that the science was settled and that we, as a civilization, were running out of time.

And yet, in the intervening years, uncertainty remained about GW’s real time impacts which may be rooted in the fact that many of IPCC’s essential climate forecasts of consequence have not materialized as predicted. Even as the staid Economist magazine recently noted

“Over the past fifteen years, air temperatures at the Earth’s surface have been flat while greenhouse gas emissions have continued to soar.”

Before the IPCC formed, NOAA’s Mauna Loa Observatory in Hawaii registered co2 levels at under 350 ppm (parts per million) with the explicit warning that if co2 exceeded that number, Mother Earth was in Big Trouble – and there would be no turning back for humanity. Those alarm bells continue today as co2 levels have risen to 414 ppm as temperatures peaked in 1998.

From the outset, the IPCC controlled the debate by limiting its charter “to understanding the scientificbasis of risk of human-induced climate change, its potential impacts and options for adaptation and mitigation.”

In other words, before any of the science had been done, the IPCC’s assumption was that man-made activity was responsible and that Nature was not an active participantin a process within its own sphere of interest. As an interdisciplinary topic of multiple diversity, the IPCC is not an authority on all the disciplines of science within the CC domain.

While there is no dispute among scientists that the Sun and its cyclical output is the true external force driving Earth’s energy and climate system as part of a Sun-centered Universe, the IPCC’s exclusion of the Sun from its consideration can only be seen as a deliberate thwarting of a basic fundamental law of science, a process which assures a free inquiry based on reason and evidence. It is the Sun which all planets of the solar system orbit around, that has the strongest gravitational pull in the solar system, is the heaviest of all celestial bodies and its sunspots in relation to Earth’s temperatures has been known since Galileo began drawing sunspots in 1613. Yet the IPCC which touts a ‘scientific view of climate change’ would have us believe the Sun is irrelevant and immaterial to the IPCC’s world view and Earth’s climate; hardly a blip on their radar.
Located at the center of the Antarctica ice sheet, the Vostok Research Center is a collaborative effort where Russian and French scientists collected undisturbed ice core data in the 1990’s to measure the historic presence of carbon dioxide levels. The Vostok samples provided the first irrefutable evidence of Earth’s climate history for 420,000 year including the existence of four previous glacial and interglacial periods. Those samples ultimately challenged the earlier premise of co2’s predominant role and that carbon dioxide was not the climate culprit once thought. It is fair to add that IPCC related scientists believe Vostok to be ‘outliers’ in the GW debate.

The single most significant revelation of the ice core studies has been that GW could not be solely attributed to co2 since carbon dioxide increases occurred after temperature increases and that an extensive ‘lag’ time exists between the two. Logic and clear thinking demands that cause (co2) precedes the effect (increased temps) is in direct contradiction to the assertion that carbon dioxide has been responsible for pushing higher global temperatures. Just as today’s 414 ppm precedes current temps which remain within the range of normal variability.

Numerous peer-reviewed studies confirmed that co2 lags behind temperature increases, originally by as much as 800 years. This study proves CO2 lags Temperature in the Antarctic ice cores and proves CO2 cannot be causing heating in the present:

joannenova.com.au/global-warming-…ore-graph/

www.globalresearch.ca/global-war…um/5680254

[Image: time-un-chief-tuvalu-island.jpg?resize=2...;amp;ssl=1]

You can’t get much more lying than in this new Time article with a front page of the UN chief posing in water.

“The newest TIME magazine cover features United Nations chief António Guterres standing in the water off the island nation of Tuvalu, which the outlet called “one of the world’s most vulnerable countries” to global warming.

The photo, taken during Guterres’ four-country tour of Pacific nations in May, is meant to illustrate one point — that island nations are sinking in the face of global warming-induced sea-level rise.

TIME titled it’s Thursday cover story, “Our Sinking Planet.” There’s just one problem: Scientific studies show Tuvalu’s islands, indeed most Pacific islands, have actually grown in the face of sea level rise.

A 2018 study found that Tuvalu’s total land area grew nearly 3 percent from 1971 to 2014, despite rising sea levels. Satellite and aerial photos showed eight of Tuvalu’s nine atolls and three-quarters of its reef islands increased in size over the last four decades.

Study lead author Paul Kench told AFP, “the dominant mode of change over that time on Tuvalu has been expansion, not erosion.” Kench made similar findings in a 2010 study.”

climatechangedispatch.com/un-chi…-time-mag/

dailycaller.com/2019/06/13/un-ch…ine-cover/

New Study: U.S. East Coast Has GROWN +5 cm/year Since 1960 After Eroding -55 cm/year During 1830-1956

https://i2.wp.com/notrickszone.com/wp-content/uploads/2019/06/Hansen-1988-prediction-West-Side-Highway.jpg?resize=864%2C583&ssl=1

Of course the West Side Highway is not underwater today.

Nor does it appear that there have been any detectable changes to its shoreline position since 1936.

In fact, outside the realm of popularized alarmism, it is well known that geological processes are more determinative of relative sea level changes than climate factors contributing to sea level rise or fall (i.e., glacier melt or advance).

notrickszone.com/2019/06/13/new-…1830-1956/

There are no more floods, droughts, tornados, hurricanes, forest fires OR heat waves then there was before. Although you hear this on the mass media it is not true:

https://i2.wp.com/policlimate.com/tropical/global_running_ace.png?w=1165

https://i2.wp.com/www1.ncdc.noaa.gov/pub/data/cmb/images/tornado/clim/EF3-EF5.png?w=1165

[Image: ccsp-drought.jpg?w=718]

wattsupwiththat.com/extreme-weather-page/

https://i1.wp.com/www.thegwpf.com/content/uploads/2019/06/Pielke-2018-1024x583.png?resize=1024%2C583&ssl=1

WHY SCIENTISTS WHO KNOW GLOBAL WARMING ISN’T CAUSING MORE EXTREME WEATHER STAY QUIET

Many climate scientists have lost their jobs, their grants, their university tenure, all for opposing fake global warming:

www.thegwpf.com/this-scientist-p…-attacked/

h/t Natura Naturans

from https://www.investmentwatchblog.com/global-warming-morphs-into-the-solar-minimum/

Thanks! You've already liked this
No comments